Risk 360

Difference Between Financial Risk Management and Enterprise Risk Management

Risk is inherent in any business activity. It can manifest in numerous ways and across various spheres of an organization, from financial transactions to overall enterprise operations. Two key concepts in the realm of risk management are Financial Risk Management and Enterprise Risk Management (ERM). Though both deal with risk mitigation, they address different types and scopes of risk. Let’s delve into the differences between the two.

Financial Risk Management:

Financial risk management is the practice of identifying, analyzing, and mitigating the financial risks that an organization faces. These risks typically stem from volatility in different markets that can affect an organization’s financial stability. The types of risks often managed under Financial Risk Management include:

  1. Market Risk: This pertains to potential losses due to changes in market factors such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates, commodity prices, and equity prices.
  2. Credit Risk: This deals with the uncertainty of a counterparty (like a borrower or issuer of a financial instrument) failing to fulfill their obligations.
  3. Liquidity Risk: This involves the risk that a firm will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they come due.

The aim of Financial Risk Management is to minimize potential losses from unexpected changes in these areas. Techniques used include financial analysis, statistical modeling, hedging strategies, and the use of derivatives.

Enterprise Risk Management (ERM):

Enterprise risk management, on the other hand, takes a more holistic approach to risk management. It involves the identification, assessment, and planning of all possible risks that an organization may face. The primary goal of ERM is to ensure that the firm’s risks are managed in a way that aligns with its overall business strategy and objectives. ERM encompasses a wide range of risks, including:

  1. Operational Risk: This involves risk from the failure of internal processes, people, or systems – covers over 200 areas of risks.
  2. Strategic Risk: This pertains to potential losses or missed opportunities due to inappropriate business strategies or failure to execute strategies effectively.
  3. Compliance Risk: This relates to potential legal penalties, financial forfeiture, and material loss an organization faces when it fails to comply with laws and regulations.
  4. Reputation Risk: This deals with potential damage to a company’s reputation, which can lead to loss of revenue or decrease in market value.

While financial risk is a significant component of ERM, ERM’s scope is much broader, encompassing virtually every risk that can impact an organization.

In Conclusion: While both Financial Risk and ERM aim to protect an organization from adverse events, they differ in their scope and the types of risk they address. Financial Risk Management is more focused, dealing specifically with risks that can affect an organization’s financial stability. On the other hand, Enterprise Risk Management is broader, aiming to understand and manage all risks that an organization may face, be they financial, operational, strategic, or otherwise. A robust risk management system would typically involve both Financial Risk and ERM strategies working in conjunction to effectively mitigate risk at all levels of the organization. Become a Certified ERM professional and earn the IRM designation from the world’s leading professional body across 140 countries.


You may also like

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More in Risk 360